Avem de învațat atâta timp cât trăim, poate doar nu știm unde să privim, sau nu vrem ...
Apă curgătoare (permanentă), care curge la vale în mod natural.
Me:
Another good joke, should I understand that this is the greatest proof of the Globate?
Cartoons irrelevant to reality ?!
Do you need help with a scale sketch ?!
Do you have any idea what you're talking about ?
Another good joke, should I understand that this is the greatest proof of the Globate?
Cartoons irrelevant to reality ?!
Do you need help with a scale sketch ?!
Do you have any idea what you're talking about ?
|
|
Ma repet se pare ca ai nevoie de o reprezentare la scara sa intelegi.
Forta ta , super forta Gravitationala este perpendiculara pe suprafata presupusei sfere in orice punct.
Elevatia ta, indiferent de pozitia relativa pe presupusa sfera nu are justificare fiindca in sistemul tau nu exista sus sau jos , doar "forte " perpendiculare pe o suprafata .
Inaltimea oricarui munte este infima in raport cu lungimea aceor mai mari fluvii.
Nil, Amazon, Dunare...
Lake Albert is under the Bulge(in reprezentarea ta non scala)
I repeat, it seems that you need a scale representation to understand.
Your force, the super-gravitational force, is perpendicular to the surface of the supposed sphere at any point.
Your elevation, regardless of the relative position of the supposed sphere has no justification because in your system there is no up or down, only "forces" perpendicular to a surface.
The height of any mountain is insignificant in relation to the length of those largest rivers.
Nile, Amazon, Danube ...
Lake Albert is under the Bulge (in your non-scale representation)
Forta ta , super forta Gravitationala este perpendiculara pe suprafata presupusei sfere in orice punct.
Elevatia ta, indiferent de pozitia relativa pe presupusa sfera nu are justificare fiindca in sistemul tau nu exista sus sau jos , doar "forte " perpendiculare pe o suprafata .
Inaltimea oricarui munte este infima in raport cu lungimea aceor mai mari fluvii.
Nil, Amazon, Dunare...
Lake Albert is under the Bulge(in reprezentarea ta non scala)
I repeat, it seems that you need a scale representation to understand.
Your force, the super-gravitational force, is perpendicular to the surface of the supposed sphere at any point.
Your elevation, regardless of the relative position of the supposed sphere has no justification because in your system there is no up or down, only "forces" perpendicular to a surface.
The height of any mountain is insignificant in relation to the length of those largest rivers.
Nile, Amazon, Danube ...
Lake Albert is under the Bulge (in your non-scale representation)
It seems that the limitation is at the rank of art.
That is, the diagram with the whole sphere shows a curved water but the geoid has water approximately, at a straight level, that is what we experience.
Who are you trying to impress with these drawings?
Do you need help?
of a sketch to scale?
http://dezordine.weebly.com...
That is, the diagram with the whole sphere shows a curved water but the geoid has water approximately, at a straight level, that is what we experience.
Who are you trying to impress with these drawings?
Do you need help?
of a sketch to scale?
http://dezordine.weebly.com...